|
The following analysis is ® Mark Feezell, and may not be reproduced or redistributed without permission
I must say that Peter’s character growth is really the most difficult to understand on a deeper level, in part because we don’t see the full import of it until we first understand the three younger children. This is why I have ordered my series from Lucy to Peter and not the other way around. All four children are important (even integral) to the story, but because of Peter’s leadership position, he ties their journeys together in a unique way. As such, our consideration of Peter should incorporate the discussions we have had about Lucy, Edmund, and Susan (links here). Peter’s growth is MORE than a transition from immaturity to maturity (all of the children undergo that transition, as we have explored in our other discussions). Furthermore, Peter’s growth is MORE than a question of developing from timidity to bravery. After all, if the story were really only about "the boy becoming brave," shouldn’t it be "Peter the Valiant" and not "Peter the Magnificent"? The truth is that each of the four children must discover courage. Lucy develops the courage to ACT OUT her inner compassion. Edmund develops the courage to ACT SELFLESSLY from his EXPERIENCE (a beautiful culmination of which is his selfless attack against the witch). Susan develops the courage to TRUST (her gifts, Peter, and Aslan). Each of the three younger children is required to be brave enough to do the one thing they find most difficult, and in the end, none is braver than the others. But what then is the point of Peter? I believe that as the future high king, Peter Pevensie must develop THE COURAGE TO LEAD WISELY. In connection with this process, Peter undergoes growth in two distinct yet related arenas of duty. First, he grows in his duty to balance the strengths of his younger siblings in order to protect and lead his family effectively; I will refer to this as his "first duty" or his "primary duty." Second, and more importantly, Peter grows in his sense of duty to concerns beyond his own family; I will refer to this as his "higher duty."
Comments are orginized by the movie scene order, and you can jump to any particular part of the character analysis by clicking on one of the links below.
Quick Links:
[Note: In the same scene, Edmund makes a comment that he can get on the train by himself. Amazing what they fit into a scene that must last less than 30 seconds - but the whole movie is like that. That is why, after five viewings, I am certain I am STILL missing important details.] As they board the train, Peter tries to put Edmund’s luggage in the overhead compartment, and Edmund insists on doing it himself, adding to the tension between them.
Peter is oblivious to Lucy’s fear as they are listening to the radio report about the bombing of London. At this point, he is more concerned with his own thoughts (their home in London? The soldier at the train station? Their father’s fate?) than he is about his mother’s charge to look out for the others. It takes Susan (a bit tender-hearted or "gentle" even this early) to remind him of his duty, and he then does a wonderful job comforting Lucy with promises of adventures to come.
When Lucy emerges from the wardrobe, Peter must decide how to handle the situation. Again we see him mediating among his three siblings: will he listen to Lucy’s childlike innocence or Susan’s practical reasoning? How will he handle Edmund’s troubled heart? In this first major test of his leadership, Peter fails miserably. Lucy ends up crushed ("But I did go there..." *crying*), Edmund ends up angry ("You think you’re Dad, but YOU’RE NOT!"), and Susan ends up feeling like her sound advice was ignored, smugger than ever ("That was nicely handled."). In one stroke, Peter elicits the worst character flaws of each of his siblings, and none of their individual strengths. Again, an incredible amount of complex character development is packed into a very short amount of screen time.
During the cricket game, Peter bowls a bad wicket and hits Edmund in the leg, and the audience is led to suspect that he does it on purpose. When Edmund breaks the window, Peter accuses him, saying, "You’ve done it now." It is a little strange that Peter runs away from "the Macready" the way the other children do. In fairness, it is difficult to conceive of a motivation for returning to the wardrobe that would be truly plausible. In any case, Peter’s action here is that of a child, not an adult, and certainly not the strong leader he would later become.
Peter insists that the children take the coats from the wardrobe, a means of providing protection for the siblings. From this point on, Peter never fails to consider his obligation to protect his siblings. He finally begins to focus on his primary duty to his family. However, it takes him quite a long time to develop the ability to properly execute and balance that duty against his higher duty to country.
After Mr. Beaver reveals the prophecy about the four thrones, it is Peter who utters the line, "We’re not heroes." At this point in the story, he is quite right. Peter has a very long way to go before he develops the personal courage and strength to serve as High King.
When he realizes the gravity of the situation, his countenance changes entirely. As the children watch Edmund walk into the Witch’s trap, it is Peter who runs after him first (after Lucy cries out in horror). Mr. Beaver has to physically restrain him from rushing into the castle to save his brother. He agrees to go to Aslan when Mr. Beaver tells him, "Only Aslan can save your brother now." In other words, true fidelity to Peter’s first duty will require fidelity to his higher duty as well.
The ice scene is important for Peter because it is another example of his continuing growth in personal courage and leadership skills. Specifically, he is learning to trust his own instincts, and developing the courage he will need to face Maugrim at Aslan’s camp. The real significance of this scene, however, has to do with the idea of duty and chivalry. To become King, Peter’s idea of duty must expand beyond the promise he made to his mother at the train station to "look out for the others." In the ice scene, Mr. Beaver’s alternative to Susan’s proposal is the fact that "Narnia needs you." Significantly, this is the first time we see Peter seriously considering his duty to NARNIA, not merely his siblings. The conflict for Peter is NOT between reason and faith (as I myself have written incorrectly in the past). For one thing, as others have pointed out, Susan is not really being very reasonable here, and Peter is not being asked to trust in anything per se. The true conflict is between TWO LEVELS OF DUTY: Susan wants Peter to focus solely on his duties from the world of England, while Mr. Beaver is appealing for Peter to accept his (higher) Narnian duties as well. So it makes perfect sense for Susan to appeal to "Mum" - after all, Peter’s first duty is to fulfill the promise he made to Mum. The idea of two conflicting levels of duty also explains why Susan is so angry when they leave the river and Lucy is missing: by considering his duty to Narnia, Peter appears to have neglected his (primary) duty to protect his family.
Peter’s progression thus far has been:
Then Peter has his important conversation with Aslan. Aslan admonishes him, "I will do what I can for your brother. But I want you to consider what I ask of you. I also want my family safe." Here again are the two levels of duty: English and Narnian. As Peter is considering this statement, Susan’s horn is heard, and he is called to his first true fight. Although his sense of duty to his sisters pulls him into the fight, the result of his courage is the first victory for Narnia, and the first loss for the Witch’s army. Peter’s sense of duty and courage must embrace not only his own family but also his wider duty to Narnia, and the two levels of duty are inseparably intertwined. After he succeeds in the fight, Aslan designates him a "Knight of Narnia".
Peter’s ability to lead wisely is still developing, however. When the Witch arrives to ask for Edmund’s life, Peter responds emotionally by drawing his sword, ready to fight her. In a bitter irony, the Witch rebukes him for attempting to exercise force in an unjust manner: "Do you think you can deny me my rights, little king?" Peter now has the willingness to fight (for his siblings, at least), but he still lacks the ability to analyze a situation and respond WISELY. Bravery without wisdom is foolishness. After the Witch renounces her claim on Edmund’s life, the four children discuss whether to stay in Narnia. Peter tells the younger three that he is sending them back to England so that he can stay and fight. He has now clearly taken to heart the higher duty embodied in the words of the beaver at the ice dam (and the fox by the fireside) that Narnia needs him. Yet the execution of that higher duty is still lacking balanced wisdom. Lucy sums up Peter’s error when she says, "They need us...ALL FOUR OF US." Wisdom in leadership requires reason, experience, and unselfish emotion (esp. compassion and trust), balanced courageously in the right proportions. As a leader, Peter must learn to balance the insights and strengths of Susan, Edmund, and Lucy. Susan’s strength is reason that knows its limitations, can trust others, and is tender and open to compassion. Edmund’s strength is experience that knows the weakness of the enemy and has tasted the death that betrayal can bring. Lucy’s strength is empathy empowered to act in a positive way to help others. All three siblings show their greatest strengths in this conversation, and all three make a positive contribution to Peter’s leadership. Edmund brings in his experience, stating that he has "seen what she [the Witch] can do, and...helped her do it." Lucy makes the bold statement out of love for the Narnians that "they need us," and Susan makes the perfectly reasonable statement that they need to practice - a logically obvious fact - if they are to help. It is after this that we see Edmund and Peter practicing together.
Peter’s growth is finally complete in the scene with Oreius and Edmund. Even though Aslan is gone, Edmund tells Peter that there is an army ready to follow him: "Aslan believed that you could do it...and so do I." Validated by his brother and now fully ready to accept his higher duty to Narnia, Peter Pevensie looks at the battle map, begins to plan his strategy, and becomes King Peter the Magnificent.
And one more tribute, the most important of all: to Lewis. Any one of the four character journeys we have discussed would be more than sufficient to make a compelling story by itself. It is the true genius of Lewis that he was able to take not one, but FOUR compelling character journeys and weave them together into one amazing story. The movie is visually stunning, well edited, and carefully considered, but it would be absolutely nothing without Lewis. His brilliant art is the glow that fuels the embers behind the whole beautiful story. - Mark Feezell
|